This issue must be related to the new Magento Email Queue system, that leaves orphan records on the Recipients table. If this is your issue, I send you a fix.
The new Magento Email Queue system manages these two tables: core_email_queue
and core_email_queue_recipients
. The former one handles the email Messages, and the later one, the Recipients of these messages.
The core_email_queue
table is cleaned out as emails on the Magento Email Queue are sent. This cleaning is performed by a cron tab job called core_email_queue_clean_up
, that's defined inside the app/code/core/Mage/Core/etc/config.xml
config file. The code that performs the cleaning is defined on the removeSentMessages
function in the Mage_Core_Model_Resource_Email_Queue
class:
/**
* Remove already sent messages
*
* @return Mage_Core_Model_Resource_Email_Queue
*/
public function removeSentMessages()
{
$this->_getWriteAdapter()->delete($this->getMainTable(), 'processed_at IS NOT NULL');
return $this;
}
The above code is executed once a day by the cron task.
But it happens that the core_email_queue_recipients
table (the one that holds email Recipients, and that is linked to the core_email_queue
table by the message_id field ), is not cleaned together with the core_email_queue
table (the one that holds email Messages), leaving orphan records inside that Recipients table when then Message table is cleaned out.
The issue described here arises when the core_email_queue
table (Messages) is reset and the autoincrement message_id
field on this table is reinitiated to 1.
Because the core_email_queue_recipients
table (Recipients) has not been cleaned accordingly, when new emails are added to the Magento Email Queue, new records are created on the core_email_queue table (with message_id
starting again from 1), and at the same time new records are created on the core_email_queue_recipients
table with these same ids (starting again from 1).
The problem is that these ids may already exist on the Recipients table as orphans records (due to previous email messages). These new mesages ids then get repeated inside the core_email_queue_recipients
table. In the end, different email Messages are linked to their corresponding Recipients by the message_id
, but they get also wrongly linked to previous recepients that were assigned the same message_id
from previous emails.
Thus, when recipients are searched to send a given message, besides the appropriate recipient, other wrong recipients may arise.
Fortunately the fix for this issue is easy to perform.
All that's needed is cleaning all repeated messages ids on the core_email_queue_recipients
table, and making sure that when a Message is deleted on the core_email_queue
table, at the same time its corresponding Recipients get deleted on the core_email_queue_recipients
table.
The best way to achieve this is to create a foreign key that links these records and deletes them on cascade (but you need to make some cleaning before you can do that).
For solving the order email issue I followed the below steps:-
1) Execute the following two SQL queries to clean the core_email_queue_recipients
table from orphan records and repeated messages ids:
DELETE FROM core_email_queue_recipients WHERE message_id NOT IN (SELECT message_id FROM core_email_queue);
DELETE FROM core_email_queue_recipients WHERE recipient_id < (SELECT recipient_id FROM (SELECT recipient_id FROM core_email_queue_recipients ORDER BY message_id ASC, recipient_id DESC LIMIT 1) AS r);
The first query deletes orphan records, and the second one deletes old records that are no longer valid.
2) Create a foreign key on the core_email_queue_recipients
table to delete Recipients records on cascade. The SQL query to create this foreign key is:
ALTER TABLE core_email_queue_recipients ADD FOREIGN KEY(message_id) REFERENCES core_email_queue(message_id) ON DELETE CASCADE;
By using this new foreign key, no orphan records will be left on the core_email_queue_recipients
table when cleaning the core_email_queue
table, and no duplicated messages to wrong recipients will be sent in the future.
Same problem here... Did you found the solution?
by Barret0